|
Colonial Sudbury mtDNA Project Navigation: [ERA home]  [Email us]  [Join ERA]  [Genealogy]  [Y-DNA]  [Reunion]  This web page is currently under construction. Please be patient while we collect and organize. Highlighted technical terms are explained in the Glossary. Note: a term may be used many times but is highlighted only the first time within each section. Last updated: 2008 May 31 |
The Edmund Rice (1638) Association has a project underway seeking to identify umbilical lines that passed through Sudbury before 1700. Primarily, we wish to locate and test documented modern female-line descendants of the women of that place and time, to provide a check on the conventional genealogy by direct comparison of the mtDNA. As an added benefit, we hope to discover, partly by sheer serendipity, some previously unknown distaff relationships among the early colonists.
The early settlers of Sudbury, Massachusetts, formed a cohesive community with the same families regularly intermarrying and eventually spreading out in all directions. Many of them came from the southeast of England, but they had not been a community before arriving in the New World. They can be expected to display a cross-section of the English mtDNA. (For an interesting discussion of the English antecedents of Colonial Sudbury, see Powell's Puritan Village.)
Even though the keeping of vital records of the early Massachusetts towns was mandated by law, and, on the whole, the records were carefully kept, there are many gaps, as well as lamentable instances where marriages were recorded without the maiden names of the brides, much less the parents' names. Therefore, we see a need for connections that mitochondrial DNA studies can meet -- bridging the gaps left by the vital records.
You, too, can participate. We have arranged with FamilyTree DNA (FTDNA) to offer mtDNA analysis to our project for the reduced, group rates. This includes the possibility of simultaneously testing both mtDNA and Y-DNA for participants who happen to be male, but we have no plans at present for analyzing the two types of DNA together.
This project is open to anyone whose umbilical (female-line) ancestors lived before 1700 in the town of Sudbury, Massachusetts, or in the neighboring towns of Concord, Framingham, Marlborough, Natick, Stow, or Watertown, including the parts that subsequently became Acton, Bedford, Carlisle, Hudson, Lincoln, Maynard, Northborough, Southborough, Waltham, Wayland, Westborough, and Weston. If you believe your ancestry meets this criterion, please get in touch.
For more information write to our project administrator/coordinator:
Bob Rice.
 
More information about this project: email Bob Rice.
The USGenWeb project website for Massachusetts.
the Sudbury Archives (historical documents relating to Sudbury history)
For information about the Edmund Rice (1638) Association (and how to join, should you care to do so), please visit our membership page.
 
 
At the end of this page, we present the DNA test results we have obtained so far. As matches are found and confirmed, these results may be rearranged to emphasize the genealogical links.
In Table 1, each line of data begins with a unique ID. The 4-, 5-, and 6-digit ID's refer to FTDNA results. Results found in the SMGF database are denoted by "sm" and two digits. If and when we obtain data from other sources, we will introduce a distinct notation to distinguish such results. For example, ID's consisting of "N" and a number will refer to members of the Genographic Project who have also joined our project.
When we identify a shared lineage to a common ancestor on the part of two or more testees, we present the name of that ancestor in an extra, color-coded line in the table.
The test results in this table are shown as a list of differences from the CRS. Each difference is expressed as a substitution for, insertion into, or deletion from the reference. A substitution is shown as a number in the range 1-16569 (giving the location within the reference sequence), followed by the code letter for the discrepant nucleotide. An insertion is displayed similarly, but the number refers to the nucleotide immediately before the insertion, and is followed, first, by a period and another number indicating the order of insertion (in the case of multi-base insertions). When only one nucleotide is inserted, this insertion number is a "1". A deletion is indicated by a minus sign instead of a letter code.
Note: the position numbers for hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) are all
in the range 16000-16569 and are sometimes abbreviated by leaving
out the "16" in front. Do not confuse these locations with
those in HVR2. To avoid confusion, we include the leading "16"
for these locations in the table.
 
Coming soon!
 
There are many other geographic-based mtDNA studies, some of which may be relevant for the ancestors of early Sudbury colonists, and others which may be relevant for their descendants. In addition, there is a global, public database of user-contributed test results, known as Mitosearch, which contains test results uploaded by members of our project, among others. This database can be searched for near-matches.
Another global mtDNA database is maintained by SMGF. This database is searchable both by haplotype and by surname. The results in the database are presented with the associated pedigrees submitted by the test subjects, but the subjects themselves are anonymous.
A third relevant database is that of the
Genographic Project conducted under the auspices of the National
Geographic Society. This project is not a genealogical one, but is
aimed at population studies, such as tracing the paths of human migration
over tens of thousands of years. The main thrust of this project is the
analysis of isolated indigenous populations around the world, but another
component is a study open to the public. Participants in this public
study are given their choice of the FTDNA 12-marker Y-DNA test (males
only) or the FTDNA mtDNA HVR1 test. In either case, the measured
haplotype is used as a predictor of the participant's ancestors'
migration routes. After these initial results are returned, the
participants are routinely invited to follow up with the genealogical aspects
of DNA testing by joining a genealogical project at FTDNA, and we hope
that some of the participants will have lineages back to Sudbury
and will join our project.
(Note: the
link to the Genographic Project may not work for some web browsers.)
 
This project is just beginning. We do not have much to report yet,
but we do have one confirmed match already:
three test subjects whose MRCA is Martha
(___), the wife of immigrant John Bent of Sudbury.
(See Table 1.)
 
| ID | Haplogroup | HVR1 | HVR2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martha ___ (c1600?-1679) | |||
| 1673 | U* | 16183C,16189C,16325C | |
| 102849 | U* | 16183C,16189C,16325C | |
| sm38 | U* | 16183C,16189C,16193.1C+,16325C | 73G,150T,152C,263G,315.1C |
| 17204 | U4 | 16355T,16356C,16519C | 73G,146C,195C,263G,309.1C,315.1C,499A |
| 105522 | U* | 16192T,16311C | |
| 108895 | U5b | 16174T,16189C,16270T,16311C | 73G,146C,150T,263G,309.1C,309.2C,315.1C,516T |
| sm37 | H | 16304C | 263G,315.1C,456T |
| + This mutation is never reported by FTDNA. | |||
© Copyright 2008 by the Edmund Rice (1638) Association