Spring 2003 Newsletter

President's Column:
    Genealogy is in grave danger of being smothered by false information arising from the Internet. The Internet's email system also has been badly damaged by SPAM. -Those ads one gets as he or she clicks on "you've got mail". The Internet arose from the need of ARPA (the Advance Research Projects Agency) to rapidly communicate with all the labs across the country. It was built upon trust and non-commercial use. Now greed in various forms is transforming this marvel of the world. No one monitors anything that is put on the web for veracity. Each user must do that and some new genealogists are not doing it.
    Many genealogy groups both local and national are suffering because people wrongly think they can do all their genealogy on line. The Edmund Rice Association luckily has so far not lost membership; in fact it has grown slightly to almost 500 dues-paying members.
    But if one were to type EDMUND RICE into a box of many search engines they would get mostly mis-information. They would be told the following from Family Search of LDS:
Birth, 1594, Of Stanstead, Suffolk, England; Christening, 11 Aug 1600, Buckinghamshire, Sudbury, England; Death 3 May 1663, Marlboro, Massachusetts, Burial May 1663 Sudbury, Middlesex, Massachusetts.
    Only the death and burial are accurate. (Buckinghamshire is a county but Sudbury is a town in another county, Suffolk.) Furthermore they would be told that for his parents there were three choices: Henry (Thomas) Rice and Margaret Baker; or Henry Rice and Elizabeth Frost; Thomas Rice and Catherine Howard. All are wrong. WE DO NOT KNOW HIS PARENTS or when and where he was born.
    If you used Ancestry.com you would get back 2063 entries for Edmund Rice. For the first four you would be told:
1. Birth, abt 1594, Stanstead, England, death May 1663, Marlboro, MA., Father Thomas Rice, Spouses Mercy Hurd, Thomasine Frost
2. Birth nothing, death 1663, Marlboro, Spouse Mercy Hurd
3. Birth, 1594, Berkhamstead, death 1663 no place, Spouse Tamazine Hosmer, Mercy (2) UNKNOWN.
4. Birth NOTHING, death, NOTHING, spouse NOTHING, Father, Edmund Rice, Mother, Thomasine Frost. (Edmund did not have a son named Edmund).
    One could go on and on with other search engines to say nothing of message boards and individual web sites. If lucky you would be directed to our ERA web site. This inaccuracy has been known for many years. I am sure that both LDS and Ancestry know these entries are false as are many many others but they have chosen to do nothing to correct them. They advertise the millions or billions of names they have instead.
    In discussing genealogy from the Internet some of us at a local genealogy society concluded that the only response to someone who says they have gotten genealogical information from the Internet is to just START LAUGHING. If it is explained how the person verified the information then it is OK to stop laughing.
    Any better suggestions?
    All this is not to say the Internet is useless, it is not but must be used with caution and verification.

Bob Rice
P.S. Just in case: For accurate information about Edmund Rice see: www.edmund-rice.org

Editor's Column:
    This is my first newsletter of any kind since doing the gossip column for the school paper in seventh grade. Fortunately, I don't have to dig up juicy gossip anymore (and then get in trouble for it), so this should be comparatively easy.
    I think there are some other very interesting articles in this issue, particularly for me Gary Rice's on his Coat of Arms, and John Chandler's on "The Family Thicket". I thought coats of arms came from antiquity and had no idea that Canadians can have one designed for them, nor did I expect all the symbolism that a creative person can get into one design. And I'm sure that most of you have noticed, as John did, how inter-related families were, especially in the early days of this country, resulting more in family thickets than nice, neat family trees.
    Very often, the articles are from the same people time after time. I assume they send them in because they enjoy doing it, but don't feel like they have a monopoly. I think it would be great to get contributions from a wider range of people, and I'd love to worry about having too much. If you have an idea, but aren't sure how to go about it, contact me and we can discuss it. Likewise if you'd like to contribute something, but don't know what to write about - together we could come up with ideas.
    As a former gossip columnist, I still think it is interesting and important to know about the milestones in the lives of us, the members. Send me that kind of stuff, it reminds us while we're poking around in the genealogical past that we a community of cousins.
    And let me know what you think, what you like and dislike about what is in the newsletter, or what is missing.

    It is my good fortune to have been gifted by my American and Canadian ancestors with dual citizenship. Because of this, I sometimes think of myself as a North American. This legacy allows me to enjoy the rights, and discharge the responsibilities, that were endowed by two great democracies. On the one hand, for example, I am rarely if ever hassled by immigration official when entering or leaving either country. And, I may vote in both countries, or elect to work and reside wherever I choose, and whenever I choose, anywhere between the Rio Grande and the North Pole.
    One the other side of the coin though, I am obliged to file separate annual tax returns with both the United States IRS, and the Canadian Revenue Agency.
    There are also historical differences that influence one's life. The United States Republic, born in revolution by 13 British colonies in 1776, largely severed America's British connection. Also, its Constitution provided for one elected individual, the President, to fulfill the responsibilities of Head of State and Head of Government. Conversely, Canada, retained its British ties until 1867, when its four British colonies were peacefully united as a Constitutional Monarchy. Under Canada's system, the functions of Head of State and Head of Government are separated. The Head of State is the Queen's representative in Canada, i.e., an appointed Governor General, and the Head of Government is an elected Prime Minister.
    Heraldry is a celebration based on ancient symbols of the sense people have of themselves, personally and in groups. The tradition of using distinguishing marks goes back more than eight centuries when nobles decorated the shields they used in jousting matches. Heraldry has been more broadly practised in the years since, to signify not just the individual, but societies and even nations.
    Until 1988, Canadian organizations and individuals wishing lawful armorial bearings petitioned Queen Elizabeth's traditional heraldic officers in London and Edinburgh. On that date, by Royal Letters Patent, Her Majesty transferred the exercise of her heraldic prerogative to the Governor General of Canada. The Canadian Heraldic Authority was then established within the office of the Governor General. With its creation, Canada recognized the important part heraldic symbols play in fostering Canadian identity and in visually dramatizing its history, geography and aspirations. The Heraldic Authority provides an indigenous mechanism for granting new coats of arms to Canadian communities, corporations, associations and individuals. The Authority gives all Canadians the opportunity to shape new symbols for themselves, individually and collectively.
    Requests for new arms take the form of a "petition" addressed to the Chief Herald of Canada, in a letter stating the wish "to receive armorial bearings from the Canadian Crown under the powers exercised by the Governor General".
    For individuals, it is necessary to forward with the letter: proof of Canadian citizenship; a current biographical sketch that includes educational and employment background , as well as details of voluntary and community service. They may also be asked for names of people to be contacted as confidential references.

Three categories of armorial bearings may be requested: coats of arms, flags and badges. A coat of arms is centred on a shield and may be displayed with a helmet, mantling, a crest and a motto. A grant of supporters is limited to corporate bodies and to some individuals in specific categories. Figure 1 illustrates these components.
Grants of armorial bearings, as an honour, recognize the contribution made to the community by the petitioner. The background information is therefore an important tool for the Chief Herald of Canada to assess the eligibility of the request. After review, the Chief Herald may then seek a warrant from the Herald Chancellor (Secretary to the Governor General) to grant the arms or other heraldic device deemed fitting in particular circumstances.

Figure 1

If the warrant is issued, detailed design discussions are undertaken under the supervision of the Chief Herald. Once agreement has been reached regarding the content of the new symbol, Letters Patent are prepared, setting out the terms of the grant and providing paintings of the new arms.
    The Government of Canada requires that the petitioner cover all direct costs related to the grant of armorial bearings. These are not inconsiderable, and include a fixed processing fee plus variable costs of artwork, research and Letters Patent preparation. The average time required to complete a grant is 12 to 14 months after the warrant has been signed. Grants of armorial bearings are made by the Crown to be valid forever. As a result, a sufficient amount of time is required to complete each grant.
    I first petitioned the Chief Herald in November, 2000. My Letters Patent (grant of arms) was finally received in May 2003. It is shown in Figure 2.
    Shield: The symbolism of the six compartment shield is manifold. The predominant colours of red and white are the national colours of my Canadian homeland. The colour red also signifies a guardsman's tunic, emblematic of the military service of myself, my father, and our American and Canadian familys' predecessors. The shamrock division line points to Ireland, the mother country of my wife's Murphy forebears. The pine trees are an historic symbol of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and appear on the famous pine tree shilling of the 17th century. They honour my familial connections to the Rice and Royce families of colonial New England, and my paternal grandfather's contribution to the Ottawa Valley lumber trade. They also attest that we have three children. The Maltese Cross suspended below the shield recognizes my service to the Venerable Order of the Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem, while the Canadian Forces Decoration acknowledges my service to Canada.
    Crest: The red dragon symbolizes the Welsh homeland of my Rhys progenitors and its collar of white roses marks England as the mother country of my Royce antecedents. The blue sword signifies fidelity to the profession of arms. The blue double-bitted woodsman's axe symbolizes the role of my Surtees great-grandfather in the founding of the Upper Canada Village of Clarence and my paternal great-grandfather's work as a cobbler in Lower Canada's Wakefield Village. The coronet, comprised of alternating white maple leaves and white stars, attests to my dual Canadian and United States citizenship, and the knight's helmet with a mantling and wreath in the shield's red and white colours symbolizes my life-long devotion to the Canadian Army.

Figure 2

Motto: "Pro Libertate" [For Freedom] on the scroll above the crest proclaims my resolve to defend freedom. "Dominos Agnoscimus Nullos" [We Know No Masters] on the scroll below the shield is derived from the Norseman's conviction: "We know no masters, all men are created equals." It represents the essence of my personal credo, and acknowledges the legacy of my Norwegian great-grandfather.
Cadet shields for my children were also requested, and are shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5.

Steven Ray Rice:
The arms debruised of a gold label for use during his father's lifetime. Debruised is the term used in heraldry for 'differences'. Differences are used on shields to show that the bearers are sons of the main shield holder. The first born son's shield carries a label with three points.

Figure 3

Terri Lynn Rice:
The gold bordered arms bearing the Province of Alberta's red roses symbolize her birthplace.

Figure 4

Jeffrey Allan Rice:
The gold bordered arms bearing keys of the arms of the Town of Werl, Germany, symbolize his birthplace.

Figure 5

Flag: The symbolization of my flag is the same as that of the shield. This is shown in Figure 6.
Badge : The alternating red and white colours and the blue sword repeats the major symbolism of the shield and crest. The book accents my life-long love of learning and achievements as an author. The diagonal division stands for the Cross of St. Andrew found on the flags of Scotland and Nova Scotia. It symbolizes the Scottish homeland of my Nisbitt and Henry ancestors and their homestead in Lower Canada, and is emblematic of my wife's Nova Scotia birthplace, and where her Murphy and Nickerson forebears first settled. The badge is shown in Figure 7.

The technical description of my coat of arms, flag and badge is:
Arms (Shield): Per fess treflé Gules and Argent a pale per fess treflé countercharged, three pine trees Argent.
Crest (above the shield): On a helmet mantled Gules doubled Argent within a wreath of these colours, this Crest: Out of a coronet set on the upper edge with maple leaves and mullets Argent, a demi-dragon Gules gorged with a collar of roses Argentholding in the dexter talon a sword, the sinister talon resting on a double-bitted axe Azure.

Figure 6

Figure 7

    Flag: A banner of the Arms.
    Badge: A closed book per saltire Gules and Argent surmounting a sword Azure.
Cadet Shields:
    Steven Ray Rice: The Arms debruised of a label Or during his father's lifetime.
    Terri Lynn Rice: The Arms within a bordure Or charged with three roses Gules.
    Jeffrey Allan Rice: The Arms within a bordure Or charged with three keys Gules.

    We don't know where he came from (possibly Sudbury, England) to marry at Bury St. Edmunds, a Frost girl from Glemsford, Suffolk, England and so start the Edmund Rice extended family, which persists today. His brother or father, we really don't know which, probably introduced them for Henry had married Edmund's wife's sister, Elizabeth, some 13 years before in Stanstead only a mile away from Glemsford. I once asked a volunteer at the church in Glemsford why Edmund and Thomasine were married in Bury St. Edmunds which is more than 10 miles north. She immediately replied, "they were married where they were in service" referring to the fact that most young girls were sent out to work in their teens.
    Thomasine's ancestors were embedded in Stanstead and Glemsford back to the 1460s but she and Edmund Rice after only eight or nine years moved with four children 66 miles west to Berkhamsted, Herts. A number of other relatives and neighbors also moved to Berkhamsted which was a center of Puritanism. There was also recently released land there for sale. Edmund owned 15 acres when about 11 years later they moved to Sudbury, MA.and so did some of their neighbors. That move was some 3, 000 miles west!
    Edmund was extremely active in Sudbury town government and acquired a lot of land so that he was the largest landowner. He was also active in Massachusetts Bay Colony government, first serving as deputy to the General Court in 1640. Yet within twenty years or so he was among those who moved west again to found Marlborough, MA. His descendants kept moving west as soon as the Native Americans would let them. Worcester was settled three times, the last in 1713 by Jonas Rice, my sixth great-grandfather. His son, Jonas, died in Barre, MA in 1793. My branch remained in Barre but many cousins moved north and west. I left Barre in 1942 for the west, of course, and only returned to live for good in New England in 1977.
    Until my grandfather moved from his father's 500 acres four miles from Barre center to town in 1889 all my Rice ancestors were farmers and Yankee entrepreneurs. For instance, my great-grandfather had a sawmill on the Burnshirt River next to the railroad that took him 220 miles north to find a bride as his second wife in Bolton, Quebec, Canada when he was 44.
    In addition to Ward's, The Rice Family and Sumner Chilton Powell's, Puritan Village there is a very interesting book by Roger Thompson, Mobility and Migration-East Anglian Founders of New England, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA, 1994. He paints a broad picture but interestingly mentions the Rices, Frosts, Drurys, etc.
    David Dearborn at the Rice reunion will expand on many other families' moves from New England to the north and west. He may even mention more Rices.
    Haven't you some stories to tell about moving west? We'd like to hear them.

[My own Rice ancestors moved slowly west in the 17th and 18th century, then north into southern Vermont after the Revolution. They stayed there about 100 years, then migrated south to Baltimore, where my grandfather was born. He lived in many places in France, the U.S. and the Caribbean, a restlessness that was inherited by at least one of his descendants - me! - Editor]

We usually speak of the family "tree" and even picture it as a well-shaped elm tree with the sturdy trunk representing Edmund Rice, and the stately main branches representing his numerous sons and daughters, and so on. Looking at the on-line database of Edmund's early descendants tends to reinforce this view (if you have not visited that database yet, you really should -- it places a wealth of information at your fingertips). However, some tangles are apparent even in this simplified view, such as the Rice-Rice cousin marriages like that of Thomas³ (Thomas², Edmund¹) to Anna³ (Edward², Edmund¹). What really makes things complicated, though, is the interconnection of spouses who are NOT descendants of Edmund.

Let's take as an example the family of William Ward, another early settler of Sudbury and Marlborough. He had 13 children, and, although only two of them appear in the on-line database (having married Rices), all 13 of them are connected in one way or another. Most of the following links can be seen in the master ERA database, and most have also been documented from the vital records of Marlborough and nearby towns, but some events were simply never entered in the vitals and are inferred from other sources, such as land and probate records.

1.John (c1626-1708) married Hannah Jackson and had a son John whose daughter Sarah married William Trowbridge. The Trowbridges' granddaughter Mary Trowbridge married Zerubbabel⁶ Snow (Abigail⁵ Brigham, Gershom⁴, Mary³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹). The two Johns are not in the ERA master database, but the rest of the connection is there.

2.Joanna (c1628-1718) married Abraham Williams, and their grandson Abraham Beaman married Mary⁴ Rice (Caleb³, Joseph², Edmund¹).

3.Obadiah (c1632-1717/8) had a wife Mary and also a daughter Mary who is sometimes confused with (but who was definitely NOT) the Mary Ward who married Caleb³ Rice noted above. Obadiah also had a son Obadiah Jr, who in turn had his own daughter Mary who married Thomas⁴ Drury (Rachel³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹). At the risk of getting too tangled, I must point out here that the father of Thomas⁴ Drury was also a grandchild of Edmund Rice. Back in our story, Obadiah Jr had a son Beriah who also married into the extended Rice family -- his wife was Hannah⁶ Stow (Elizabeth⁵ Brigham, Nathan⁴, Mary³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹). That's not all. Obadiah Jr had yet another son Jabez, who married Phebe⁵ Eager (Lydia⁴ Woods, Lydia³ Rice, Edward², Edmund¹).

4.Richard (c1635-1666) married Mary Moore and had two children who figure in the Rice thicket: Obadiah, who had a son Richard who married Lydia⁴ Wheelock (Lydia³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹), and

Lydia

, whose son Hezekiah Maynard married Tabitha⁵ How (Deliverance⁴ Rice, John³, Edward², Edmund¹). Note that Mary Moore was the daughter of Elizabeth Rice, daughter of Henry Rice and Elizabeth Frost, sister of Thomasine Frost (and, of course, Henry Rice is thought by many to be an older brother of Edmund¹, though proof is lacking). Mary (Moore) Ward went on to marry Daniel Stone and had a daughter Sarah, who married James³ Rice (Thomas², Edmund¹), and a daughter Mary, who married Jonas³ Rice (Thomas², Edmund¹). Note: A.H. Ward compiled a Ward genealogy which lists Mary (Moore) Ward as another child of William, but it is clear that she was actually a daughter-in-law. Mary also happens to be a pivotal figure in the search for living persons with the mitochondrial DNA of Thomasine Frost (see page 7 of the Fall 2000 Newsletter).

5.Deborah (c1637-1697) married John Johnson and had a daughter Elizabeth whose daughter Elizabeth Witherby married Nathan⁴ Rice (Caleb³, Joseph², Edmund¹).

6.Hannah (c1639-1717) married Abraham How and had a number of children who find their way into our little tangle: Mary, whose son AsaBouker married Martha⁵ Eager, sister to Phebe⁵ mentioned above in section 3, and whose son Ezekiel Bouker married Abigail⁴ Rice (Peter³, Thomas², Edmund¹); Joseph, whose son Joseph married Ruth⁵ Brigham (Jonathan⁴, Mary³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹) and whose son Abraham married Rachel⁴ Rice (Benjamin³, Edward², Edmund¹); Hannah, whose son Ephraim How married Elizabeth⁴ Rice, sister of Rachel⁴ just mentioned; Elizabeth, whose granddaughter Prudence How married Isaac⁵ How (Deliverance⁴ Rice, John³, Edward², Edmund¹) and whose grandsons Antipas and Asa Brigham married, respectively, Catherine⁵ Woods (Benjamin⁴, Lydia³ Rice, Edward², Edmund¹) and Elizabeth⁶ Warren (Zipporah⁵ Brigham, Nathan⁴, Mary³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹); Rebecca, who married Peter³ Rice (Thomas², Edmund¹); and Sarah, whose daughter Sarah Stratton married Thomas⁵ Brigham, brother of Zipporah⁵ and Elizabeth⁵ mentioned previously.

7.Samuel (1641-1729) married Sarah How and had a daughter Mary who actually did marry Caleb³ Rice already mentioned. They also had a son Joseph whose granddaughters Ruth and Mary Ward married, respectively, Ithamar⁶ Brigham (son of Thomas⁵ and Sarah mentioned in part 6 above) and Jonas⁶ Morse (Lucy⁵ Eager, Lydia⁴ Woods, Lydia³ Rice, Edward², Edmund¹) and whose grandson Daniel Ward married Anna⁵ Rice (Andrew⁴, Joshua³, Samuel², Edmund¹). Their son Samuel had a granddaughter Abigail Ward who married Josiah⁷ Bridges (James⁶, Hackaliah⁵, Sarah⁴ Brewer, Elizabeth³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹).

8.Elizabeth (1643-1710) married John How in 1662/3 although the marriage record fails to include the maiden name of the bride. That lamentable lapse in the official records leaves a trace of doubt, but the identification seems very likely. In any case, John How's widowElizabeth married second Henry Kerley and had a daughter Mercy, who married Joseph³ Rice (Joseph², Edmund¹).

9.Increase (1644/5-1690) married Record Wheelock and had a daughter Record whose daughter Persis Newton married Eleazer⁴ Rice (Edmund³, Samuel², Edmund¹) and a daughter Tabitha whose grandson Solomon Fay married Mary⁵ Pratt (Anna⁴ Allen, Mercy³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹). Increase and his daughter Tabitha do not appear in the master ERA database, but the rest of the connection does.

10.Hopestill (1646-1718) married James Woods, and this is where things start to get complicated. They had a son James whom Ward's Rice Family incorrectly identifies as Deacon James Woods (see page 114), but the Genealogical Register of Edmund Rice Descendants corrects the error and points out that the deacon in question was actually the son of John and Lydia³ (Rice) Woods (see page 6). Part of the confusion undoubtedly stems from the fact that Hopestill's husband had also served as deacon. Ward's error unfortunately propagated all the way into the published vital records of Marlborough, which accepted Ward's misstatement of the deacon's age at death, "adjusted" to fit the birth date of Hopestill's son. Nonetheless, since the Deacon's age is clearly inscribed on his gravestone, still standing in SpringhillCemetery, the problem is easily resolved. At any rate, the son of James and Hopestill quietly vanished from the scene in Marlborough sometime between his birth in 1685 and the 1718/9 marriage of the other James Woods, since the latter was then styled simply "James Woods" instead of "James Woods Jr". By the way, other children of John and Lydia Woods have already popped up in parts 3, 6, and 7 above.

11.William (1648/9-1697) married Hannah Brigham and had two children who appear in our story: William, whose son Elisha married Ruth⁴ Rice (Joseph³, Joseph², Edmund¹), and Nahum, whose daughter Persis married Bezaleel⁵ Eager, brother to Phebe⁵, Martha⁵, and Lucy⁵ already mentioned in sections 3, 6 and 7.

12.Eleazer (1650-1676) married Hannah³ Rice (Henry², Edmund¹).

13.Bethia (1658-1721) married Daniel³ Rice (Edward², Edmund¹).

These are just the most obvious cross connections. I happen to know of another connection for William Ward's eldest son John, for example: John's 6-great grandson Leonard Blanchard Chandler married Hattie Betsey⁹ Stuart (Jane Maria⁸ Houghton, Betsey⁷ Tuttle, Lucia⁶ Brewer, Peter⁵, Jonathan⁴, Elizabeth³ Rice, Henry², Edmund¹). Needless to say, the Hows, Brighams, and Eagers furnish other examples of this sort of entanglement, and the list goes on. When many family trees grow side-by-side, their branches entwine, and the result is ... the family thicket.

[My own addition to the Rice-Ward thicket: Deborah (#5) Ward Johnson's 4-great granddaughter Virtue Johnson married Ephraim 7 Rice (Daniel 6, Ephraim 5, Perez 4, Thomas 3, Thomas 2, Edmund 1). Virtue and Ephraim were my 4th g-grandparents - Editor]

SATURDAY 20 September 2003:
9:00 AM: Social time with coffee and juice in our meeting room. ERA Genealogy Books will for sale and we'll be able to examine the ERA Genealogical Computer Data Base on laptop computers.
10:00 AM: George King will hold a session on the database where you can ask questions.
Noon: Lunch will be served by RESERVATION only.
1:00 PM: our speaker, Mr. David Dearborn, FASG, 6th Floor Library Supervisor of the New England Historic Genealogical Society will speak on Migrations Out Of New England.
2:00 PM: Annual Business Meeting

RESERVATIONS
Reservations Forms for the lunch on Saturday 20 June 03 and the Tour on Friday will be in the Summer News Letter which will be sent by First Class Mail late July. The Saturday lunch will cost $20.
Reservations for sleeping rooms at the Sheraton must be made directly to the Hotel at 1-888-627-7185. Ask for the special rate of $109/room/night for the Edmund Rice Association meeting 19 and 20 September 2003 at the Sheraton Lexington, MA Hotel. Ten rooms for Friday night and five for Saturday night are being held.
Less expensive motels are some distance away in Marlboro for the Super -8 Motel at 1-800-800-8000 or in Framingham at the Motel-6 number 1-800-466-8356 or at Red Roof Inn number 1-800-733-7663.

DIRECTIONS
Take the Mass Turnpike east to Route 95 (128) north to exit 30 B. The Sheraton is just west of the interchange.

Dorothy Ann Rice Krause, sister of the ERA Historian/Information Manager Dennis Rice, passed away 1 May, of cancer. Our sympathy goes out to all he family.

Keep your eye on Broadway!
Laura McLaughlin, 17-year-old niece of your beamingly proud editor, recently performed as Luisa in The Fantasticks at The Theatre Guild of Webster Groves, MO. This was not a kids' production. The St. Louis Arts paper said,
"Whatever the cause, over the past decade too many Fantasticks have seemed hollow at the center.
So here's a happy surprise. The version on view at the Theatre Guild of Webster Groves is a beguiling delight.", and
"But it's Laura McLaughlin's sylphlike Luisa that strikes the nerve of truth. For too many years now, Luisas have been sopranos first; the required innocence has been incidental. McLaughlin is a lovely singer. But she's also so natural, one senses she might have been plucked from her back yard and dropped onto the stage. She is simply, purely Luisa, the sweet embodiment of a character who for too long has been reduced to a canary-like trill.

James P. Rice of Pekin, IL (Roswell¹⁰, Henry⁹, Roswell⁸, Gershom⁷, John⁶, Ephraim⁵, Gershom⁴, Ephraim³, Thomas², Edmund¹)

Ellen M. Blanchard of Carver, MA (Calvin Maddox¹², Laura May Stuart Rice¹¹, Melbourne¹⁰, Francis⁹, Joseph⁹, Silas⁷, Sarah Smith⁶, Abigail Wheeler⁵, Abigail Rice⁴, John³, Edward², Edmund¹ - and also Calvin Maddox¹¹, Laura May Stuart Rice¹⁰, Melbourne⁹, Francis⁸, Joseph⁷, Silas⁶, John⁵, Matthias⁴, Gershom³, Thomas², Edmund¹)

Other new members are
Scott R. Huntsman of Walnut Creek, CA
Perry L. Bent of Framingham, MA
Gordon L. Rice of Powhatan, VA
Dean & Mary Rice of Three Rivers, MI

And welcome to the newest Edmund Rice!
ERA Board of Directors member George Rice has a new grandson. He writes "My son Edmund Rice and his wife Kerri just had their first baby boy on May 7, 2003. His name...what else.... Edmund Rice, Junior! He was 8 lbs., 10 oz. and 22 inches. Ted and Kerri along with their new baby live in the Wayland Historic District on Old Sudbury Road. Their home is mid way between North Cemetery where Deacon Edmund Rice was laid to rest and his first homestead on Old Connecticut Path. The new baby EJ hasn't moved very far in 365 years". Edmund, Junior's line to the Deacon is:

The discovery by Y-DNA analysis that two well-documented descendants of sons of Gershom Rice could not be descendants of his grandfather, Edmund Rice, prompted further research[1]. A descendant of Gershom's first son did have Edmund Rice markers. A short account of stumbling upon the Rice -Royce mix-up appeared in the New England Ancestors where we could only point out the exact matching of 12 genetic markers for two apparent descendants of Gershom Rice with a single descendant of Robert Royce. That this Royce descendant bore the surname Rice, not Royce, complicated a clear understanding of the situation. DNA analysis is able to pinpoint family relationships that do not rely wholly on paper genealogy and cast new light on basic assumptions of parentage. A lot of library research was required, however, to clarify the DNA evidence and those results needed bolstering with more male Royce DNA analysis.

Three males have traced their ancestry back to Robert Royce who is first recorded in 1648 in Stratford, Connecticut. Their pedigrees have been verified. Chart 1 above shows the relationship of each verified descendant from two sons of Robert Royce. Also the generation in which surnames were changed is evident. Royce was determined to be the most common spelling in the 17th century. Filled rectangles indicate living males whose Y-DNA were analyzed.
Four other males with current surnames of Rice or Royse along with the two descendants of Abishai and Matthias Rice also have identical or nearly identical markers. Table 1 shows the detailed DNA analyses of the Royces and three different Rice families.

D Y S	3 9 3	3 9 0	1 9	3 9 1	3 8 5 a	3 8 5 b	4 2 6	3 8 8	4 3 9	3 8 9 i	3 9 2	3 8 9 ii	4 5 8	4 5 9 a	4 5 9 b	4 5 5	4 5 4	4 4 7	4 3 7	4 4 8	4 4 9	4 6 4 a	4 6 4 b	4 6 4 c	4 6 4 d
Edmund Rice	13	23	14	10	14	14	11	14	11	12	11	28	15	8	9	8	11	23	16	18	28	12	14	15	16
Robert Royce	14	23	15	10	15	16	11	13	11	14	12	32	15	8	10	11	11	25	14	20	26	11	14	14	15
3156	14	23	15	10	15	16	11	13	11	14	12	32	15	8	10	11	11	25	14	20	26	11	14	14	15
7242	14	23	15	10	15	16	11	13	11	14	12	32	15	8	10	11	11	25	14	20	26	11	14	14	15
7628	14	23	16	10	15	16	11	13	11	14	12	32	15	8	10	11	11	25	14	20	26	11	14	14	15
3730	14	23	15	10	15	17	11	13	11	14	12	32	15	8	10	11	11	25	14	20	26	11	14	14	15
5333	14	23	15	10	15	16	11	13	11	14	12	32
3758	14	23	16	10	15	17	11	13	11	14	12	32	15	8	10	11	11	25	14	20	26